Fujitsu CELSIUS M7010power

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M7010power  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3498-U2
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200203
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 16:12
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10920X-$850
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 73.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 1,034
96% 798 Pts
64-Core 1906
118% 1906 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 137
Parallax 124
97% 127 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 107
Splatting 118
106% 133 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 100%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
908GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1932 1724 1593 1506 1527 1525 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2,114
Write 1,757
Mixed 1,603
SusWrite 1,634
399% 1,777 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 68.6
258% 97.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,241
DQ Write 910
DQ Mixed 1,056
794% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 311%
Great: 355%
Transcend TS512GMTE220S 512GB
464GB free
Firmware: 42A7T36A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1630 1637 1635 1416 417 1163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,218
Write 1,618
Mixed 1,365
SusWrite 1,316
364% 1,629 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 72.3
285% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 724
DQ Write 1,035
DQ Mixed 457
464% 739 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 295%
Great: 318%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 170 172 170 172 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 145
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 169
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 126 124 125 126 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 105
Write 109
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 123
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6CJR8N-XN 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
117% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 60.5
MC Mixed 40.6
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 10.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 117%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M7010power Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M7010power

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback