| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS M7010power (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3498-U2 |
| Memory | 60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200203 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 03 '21 at 21:22 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | BEL-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-10920X-$850
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
93.3%
Outstanding
|
94% 177 Pts
|
100% 833 Pts
|
116% 1,877 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
15% 19.4 fps
|
14% 17.7 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA82GU6CJR8N-XN 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
116%
Outstanding
|
135% 47.4 GB/s
|
37% 13.1 GB/s
|
45% 88.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 60 | 19.1" | 1280 720 | SAM0226 SyncMaster |
Typical CELSIUS M7010power Builds (Compare 26 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M7010power
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon W-2225IntelBench 79%, 523 samples | 9x |
| Xeon W-2245IntelBench 88%, 471 samples | 5x |
| Core i9-10920XIntel $850Bench 87%, 3,007 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples | 11x |
| Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples | 2x |
| Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |