Gigabyte GA-P17FV7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P17FV7  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170216
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 09:10
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 99.6
49% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 283
28% 232 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 6709) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.43 fps
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.65 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e2000 256G 256GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A7T25A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 294 204 211 169 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1822
Write 981
Mixed 851
SusWrite 231
214% 971 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 38.9
142% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 500
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 427
314% 416 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 149%
Great: 279%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
803GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 117 125 130 126 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 130
Write 117
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 125
71% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSH64V4B TS1GSH64V6B 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.9% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 21.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 15.1
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P17FV7 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P17FV7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback