Intel DP55WG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemINTEL_ KBIBX10J
MotherboardIntel DP55WG  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 06:58
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 145
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 264
32% 248 Pts
64-Core 282
17% 282 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Gigabyte(1458 365D) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
8.6% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 12.2
8% 11.3 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 10.9
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.6%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 68 70 63 72 78 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 188
Write 164
Mixed 154
SusWrite 68.5
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 11.5
59% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.8
DQ Write 60.7
DQ Mixed 13.5
18% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 74%
Intel 330 Series 180GB
168GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 79 80 74 78 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.2% Poor
Read 170
Write 98.6
Mixed 102
SusWrite 75.6
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 12.4
49% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 14.1
DQ Mixed 18.5
14% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 83%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
39GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 76 72 65 48 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 72.7
Write 87.9
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 61.5
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 88 78 81 69 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 56
SusWrite 82.9
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D5434314755364D465238432D50422020 0x0198 0x393955353437312D3030322E4130304C4620 0x0198 0x393955353437312D3030322E4130304C4620 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DP55WG Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DP55WG - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $678
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback