Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 03:07
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 88.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 254
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 795
77% 634 Pts
64-Core 1,009
62% 1,009 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 120
Parallax 102
118% 122 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 118
Splatting 101
87% 107 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1083 1921 1924 1902 1587 1212 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,281
Write 1,702
Mixed 962
SusWrite 1,605
366% 1,638 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 59.4
194% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 921
DQ Write 588
DQ Mixed 707
540% 739 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 283%
Great: 353%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
172GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 476 476 478 468 433 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 445
Mixed 399
SusWrite 454
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 54.5
168% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 290
235% 334 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 115%
Great: 118%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$70
60GB free
Firmware: 57CZ Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,427
Write 1216
Mixed 888
261% 1,177 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 49.9
176% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 634
DQ Mixed 208
316% 604 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 242%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3466 C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
123% Outstanding
MC Read 44.9
MC Write 54.6
MC Mixed 45.9
138% 48.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 123%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback