Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardAMI Default string
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1200 x 1920 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 09 '22 at 18:56
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
28.9% Poor
Memory 42.1
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 47.9
25% 37.9 Pts
4-Core 92.2
8-Core 94.9
12% 93.6 Pts
64-Core 90.9
6% 90.9 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 3
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
44GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 12 11 12 11 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 77.3
Write 13.8
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 10.8
26% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.2% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback