Lenovo 90JL001NMW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90JL001NMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36E7
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 09 '22 at 13:31
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 680
73% 580 Pts
64-Core 707
44% 707 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.9% Good
Lighting 74.7
Reflection 90.7
Parallax 79
61% 81.5 fps
MRender 77.4
Gravity 76.3
Splatting 70.8
61% 74.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1L2QEXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 327 327 327 327 325 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,298
Write 1,332
Mixed 805
SusWrite 346
211% 945 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 68
225% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 977
DQ Write 1,068
DQ Mixed 1,032
774% 1,026 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 188%
Great: 247%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 959GB
333GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 424 391 323 96 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 422
Write 269
Mixed 308
SusWrite 297
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 34
121% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 206
175% 254 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 12.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90JL001NMW Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90JL001NMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback