Lenovo 90JL001NMW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90JL001NMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36E7
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 09 '22 at 13:25
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 708
74% 593 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.2% Good
Lighting 75.3
Reflection 90.5
Parallax 78.9
61% 81.6 fps
MRender 77.3
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 70.6
61% 74.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1L2QEXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 326 327 328 327 326 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1364
Write 1,236
Mixed 800
SusWrite 346
209% 937 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 63.5
214% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 969
DQ Write 1,071
DQ Mixed 1,016
766% 1,019 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 187%
Great: 247%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 959GB
333GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 421 420 413 403 287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 338
Write 117
Mixed 105
SusWrite 395
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 10.2
49% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 17.4
DQ Write 18.4
DQ Mixed 17.2
13% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90JL001NMW Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90JL001NMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback