HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	72.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8906
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211028
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '22 at 07:08
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G 1,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 75.5 1-Core 156 2-Core 281 92% 171 Pts	4-Core 475 8-Core 734 75% 605 Pts	64-Core 710 44% 710 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$235 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% HP(103C 8789) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.1% Very good	Lighting 90.3 Reflection 127 Parallax 83.5 74% 100 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 79.1 Splatting 71.2 69% 86.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB 12,950 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS4NFXV SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 128 150 144 138 106 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 976 Write 186 Mixed 282 SusWrite 136 86% 395 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 99.4 4K Mixed 40.4 157% 58.2 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 187 147% 206 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 192%
Verbatim STORE N GO 1GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1f23 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 4 4.1 4.1 4 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	4.97% Terrible	Read 14.9 Write 3.5 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 4 7% 6.77 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 30% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.97% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB 12,012 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	87.8% Excellent	MC Read 34.6 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 30.7 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 26.1 77% 27.1 GB/s	Latency 89.4 45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx Builds (Compare 4,932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 113%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 106%

UFO

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD $125Bench 86%, 14,368 samples	1,642x
Core i5-11400Intel $136Bench 94%, 24,459 samples	868x
Ryzen 7 5700GAMD $174Bench 88%, 17,091 samples	722x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	1,313x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1,162x
RX 5500AMD $160Bench 50%, 2,841 samples	705x

SSD
KIOXIA 512GBKbg40znv512gBench 164%, 11,361 samples	454x
KIOXIA 1TBKbg40znv1t02Bench 166%, 2,041 samples	347x
MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 172%, 3,650 samples	264x

RAM
HMA81GU6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9,246 samples	492x
M378A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 71%, 9,655 samples	366x
M378A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,267 samples	245x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $465

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16