HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8906
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 22:48
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 286
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 613
67% 528 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
HP(103C 8789) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.2% Very good
Lighting 88.9
Reflection 87.5
Parallax 82.7
72% 86.4 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 77
Splatting 70.5
69% 86.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 141 133 125 129 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 1,018
Write 166
Mixed 272
SusWrite 133
86% 397 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 39.8
153% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 200
144% 190 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 104%
Great: 192%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 30.7
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 24.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx Builds (Compare 4,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback