Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 18 '21 at 19:57
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 288
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 926
92% 751 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 35.2
31% 37.3 fps
MRender 32.1
Gravity 35
Splatting 31.5
27% 32.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 401 315 313 311 312 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 459
Mixed 405
SusWrite 342
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 52.2
174% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 357
268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 111%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
58GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 224 83 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 476
Mixed 407
SusWrite 160
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 45.8
159% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
832GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 203 202 201 205 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 140
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 201
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 116%
Great: 112%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 3.9 9.4 7.7 9.1 8.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
8.86% Terrible
Read 25.2
Write 1.5
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 7.5
12% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
48% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.86%
Great: 18%
Verbatim STORE N GO 1GB
1GB free, PID 1f23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.7 7.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.72% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 6.9
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 7.7
12% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
35% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.72%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.2% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.4
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $172

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback