GPU GWTN141-10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGPU GWTN141-10  (all builds)
MotherboardGPU GPU Company
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '22 at 03:53
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 50.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 120
58% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 394
46% 355 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1C6C 078B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 18.9
14% 19.3 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 13.3
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 512GB SSD 512GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08108W
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 270
Write 318
Mixed 242
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 17.1
57% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 174
144% 204 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 241%
Lexar JD Mercury 1GB
1GB free, PID a660
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 3.2 6.5 4.4 5.3 7.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
4.24% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 10.4
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 4.7
13% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.24%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GWTN141-10 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: GPU GWTN141-10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback