Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 19:39
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 217
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 563
64% 499 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Gigabyte(1458 353E) 2GB
CLim: 1045 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
7.53% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 10.4
7% 9.3 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 9.7
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.53%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 103 100 60 44 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 326
Write 143
Mixed 135
SusWrite 77.7
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 12.4
49% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 35.6
43% 77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 60%
5GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.5 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 0.3
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 4.3
5% 5.43 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-414.A00LF 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V DELUXE Builds (Compare 888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $529
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback