Jetway Em10xcPo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemJetway Em10xcPo  (all builds)
MotherboardJetway NC9J
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 15:37
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1610-$37
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 82.4
1-Core 45.5
2-Core 131
53% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 139
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
Device(16F3 0C9F) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.17.12.7584
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 0.7
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTE545032A7E380 320GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GGBOAD80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 68 74 67 71 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 78.5
Write 70.8
Mixed 30
SusWrite 70.1
45% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4KTF12864HZ-1G4K1 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Em10xcPo Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Jetway Em10xcPo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $37
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback