Jetway Em10xcPo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemJetway Em10xcPo  (all builds)
MotherboardJetway NC9J
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 13:18
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1610-$37
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 41.1
2-Core 126
48% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 125
15% 115 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
Device(16F3 0C9F) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.17.12.7584
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
0.68% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 0.7
0% 1.6 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.68%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTE545032A7E380 320GB
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GGBOAD80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 71 74 72 74 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
43% Average
Read 78.3
Write 72.8
Mixed 30
SusWrite 71.4
46% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4KTF12864HZ-1G4K1 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.7% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Em10xcPo Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Jetway Em10xcPo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $37
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback