Microelectronics G436

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics G436  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star Z490 PLUS (MS-7C98)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 04:43
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,007
96% 794 Pts
64-Core 1,603
99% 1,603 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 216
Reflection 214
Parallax 206
176% 212 fps
MRender 212
Gravity 157
Splatting 139
135% 170 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 150%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
194GB free
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 229 169 202 169 386 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 234
Write 103
Mixed 361
SusWrite 243
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 38.5
149% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 110
131% 228 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 91%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
646GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1495 841 844 843 846 834 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,556
Write 1,810
Mixed 1,440
SusWrite 950
324% 1,439 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 67.9
224% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,315
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 421
434% 734 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 230%
Great: 276%
PNY CS900 1TB SSD
406GB free
Firmware: CS900P13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 398 390 396 393 381 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 453
Mixed 355
SusWrite 377
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 40
152% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 229
196% 285 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
2TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 142 142 142 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 131
Write 133
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 142
171% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 57%
ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
526GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 191 191 192 193 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 160
Write 162
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 191
203% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD416E86-3200D 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 30.5
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 28.3
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G436 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO

System: Microelectronics G436

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $873
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback