Microelectronics G436

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics G436  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star Z490 PLUS (MS-7C98)
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 04:02
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 150
2-Core 301
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,112
100% 842 Pts
64-Core 1,604
99% 1,604 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 208
Parallax 196
177% 207 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 154
Splatting 138
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 1TB SSD
406GB free
Firmware: CS900P13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 389 397 392 395 402 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 105
Mixed 352
SusWrite 377
59% 259 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 40.3
152% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 223
193% 284 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 102%
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
194GB free
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 212 168 167 167 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 468
Write 144
Mixed 374
SusWrite 202
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 38.7
147% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 111
130% 226 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 91%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
646GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1519 836 840 843 843 845 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,571
Write 1,749
Mixed 1,352
SusWrite 954
316% 1,406 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 67.1
218% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,200
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 645
522% 760 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 225%
Great: 276%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
2TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 122 120 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 133
Write 134
Mixed 92.1
SusWrite 120
161% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 57%
ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
537GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 120 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 191
Write 118
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 120
162% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD416E86-3200D 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 30.5
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 30.5
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM776F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical G436 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO

System: Microelectronics G436

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $873
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback