TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 4524CB9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 4524CB9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 03:54
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 81.2
2-Core 155
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 277
35% 267 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 64.6%
 Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 1.5
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.05%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 116 17 58 54 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43% Average
Read 472
Write 360
Mixed 385
SusWrite 96.2
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 1
52% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 13.3
DQ Mixed 6
29% 70.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 43%
 Great: 100%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60
429GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 87 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 77.8
Write 77.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 86.5
54% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑
This bench: 47.2%
 Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5474-028.A00LF Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 10.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 9.7
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 39%
 Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 4524CB9 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4524CB9

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel  $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples16x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples7x
Xeon E3-1240IntelBench 70%, 2,292 samples2x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples17x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples2x
Radeon HD 5400ATIBench 1%, 10,400 samples2x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples2x
S600 240GBHPBench 67%, 1,240 samples2x
MX500 500GBCrucial  $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples2x
RAM
HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 42%, 2,206 samples3x
TS512MLK64V3N Kingston HP698650-154-MCN Kingston 9905417-067.A00G Kingston HP497157-D88-ELFWG 14GBUnknownBench 48%, 3 samples3x
RMR1810EC58E8F1333 2x2GBRamaxelBench 46%, 509 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback