Asrock 980DE3/U3S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 980DE3/U3S3  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150904
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 20:01
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 57.7
2-Core 84.9
47% 71.9 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 157
17% 134 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Palit(1569 0FC6) 1GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.49% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 12.4
8% 11.3 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 10.9
Splatting 11.3
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.49%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 70 41 9.9 36 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 291
Write 114
Mixed 155
SusWrite 30.2
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 11.8
46% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 11.5
46% 103 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
381GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 103 135 164 138 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 144
Write 153
Mixed 72
SusWrite 142
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1866 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 13
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback