Asrock 980DE3/U3S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 980DE3/U3S3  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '19 at 10:46
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 118
58% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 195
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Palit(1569 0FC6) 1GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.36% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 9.15
Parallax 11
7% 9.71 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 12.9
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.36%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 150 161 162 168 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 351
Write 128
Mixed 257
SusWrite 161
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 24.5
100% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 83.1
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 24.3
55% 108 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
513GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 150 150 151 151 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 171
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 149
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.8% Average
MC Read 21
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback