Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4100-$110 32,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 64 2-Core 115 58% 90 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 185 24% 179 Pts	64-Core 187 12% 187 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Palit(1569 0FC6) 1GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 9.65 Parallax 12.1 8% 10.6 fps	MRender 14 Gravity 12.2 Splatting 12.8 11% 13 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB 5,433 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM21.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 77 50 17 35 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 348 Write 188 Mixed 190 SusWrite 42 42% 192 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 13.8 81% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 23.1 DQ Write 57.2 DQ Mixed 15.2 19% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 429GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 150 151 151 152 152 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	90% Excellent	Read 164 Write 151 Mixed 78.7 SusWrite 150 99% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x2GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM 1866 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.3% Average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 18.5 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 11.1 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	5x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,343 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	3x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $253