Gigabyte GA-H61M-USB3-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-USB3-B3  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '17 at 13:24
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 170
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 240
28% 216 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 7.69
5% 7.01 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 7.22
5% 6.21 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.08 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.6% Average
Read 209
Write 147
Mixed 156
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 17.5
73% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.1
DQ Write 63.9
DQ Mixed 18.8
22% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
222GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 83.3
Write 78.4
Mixed 27.5
46% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.39
103% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-USB3-B3 Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-USB3-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback