Acer Predator PH315-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCML QX50_CMS
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 20:37
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 262
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 907
79% 676 Pts
64-Core 1,288
80% 1,288 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1441) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 193
Parallax 8.2
6% 69.5 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.9
8% 9.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-256G-1014 256GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 649 383 405 401 403 381 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,419
Write 1,945
Mixed 1,521
SusWrite 437
300% 1,331 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 57.1
189% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 913
DQ Write 681
DQ Mixed 776
586% 790 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 178%
Great: 179%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
200GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 111 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 69.4
Write 108
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 111
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 95%
ACTIONS HS USB FlashDisk 16GB
9GB free, PID 1101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 8
Write 6.3
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 7.7
10% 7.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 2.2
190% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 13%
ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.4 1.6 2.4 1.7 2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.74% Terrible
Read 3
Write 2.5
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 1.4
4% 2.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.74%
Great: 5%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
17GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 76 73 68 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 53.8
Write 30
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 75.2
67% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 23.5
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 26.7
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-53 Builds (Compare 6,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback