Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR_TUF506QR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR_TUF506QR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506QR
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 13:45
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 161
2-Core 293
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1036
96% 804 Pts
64-Core 1,473
91% 1,473 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 128C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 178
Parallax 175
148% 178 fps
MRender 203
Gravity 128
Splatting 122
120% 151 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 131%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
895GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2015 2039 2229 2385 2399 1742 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
378% Outstanding
Read 2537
Write 2,287
Mixed 2,338
SusWrite 2,135
523% 2,324 MB/s
4K Read 66.3
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 90.5
292% 99.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,370
DQ Write 1,122
DQ Mixed 1,230
925% 1,240 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 378%
Great: 477%
Usb3.1 NVME&SATA 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 678 697 692 694 696 693 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 611
Write 697
Mixed 510
SusWrite 692
142% 627 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 51.3
166% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 334
236% 299 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 131%
Great: 123%
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1153 928 838 878 806 771 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2,417
Write 2,098
Mixed 1,753
SusWrite 896
400% 1,791 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 83.6
274% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,364
DQ Write 1120
DQ Mixed 1,228
923% 1,237 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 292%
Great: 313%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
43GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 52 28 23 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 94.1
Write 25.4
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 29.7
54% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 4.6
307% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 33
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 29.9
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR_TUF506QR Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR_TUF506QR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback