HP COMPAQ ELITE 8300

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP COMPAQ ELITE 8300 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '21 at 10:11
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69% Good	Memory 75.6 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 197 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 501 52% 419 Pts	64-Core 509 32% 509 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15 52,547 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 3396) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 10.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.24% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.8 3% 2.8 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.8 3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.24% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR043 SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 422 434 432 362 213 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 349 Write 425 Mixed 372 SusWrite 378 86% 381 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 66 4K Mixed 42.1 139% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 147 167% 284 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 123%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 123 125 125 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 144 Write 122 Mixed 67.4 SusWrite 123 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 95 88 88 95 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 69.3 Write 92.6 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 90.4 58% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.5 198% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 13.8 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 89.2 45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical COMPAQ ELITE 8300 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP COMPAQ ELITE 8300

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	8x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	6x
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	2x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x

SSD
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	5x
530 Series 240GBIntel $149Bench 76%, 16,872 samples	3x
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $130Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	1x

RAM
16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GBMicronBench 46%, 3 samples	3x
RMR5030ME68F9F1600 0443 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 24GBUnknownBench 57%, 25 samples	3x
HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 4x2GBHynixBench 55%, 1,331 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $351

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16