Lenovo 10AU0065JP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10AU0065JP  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3098
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201118
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 30 '21 at 23:31
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 194
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 379
51% 379 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Nvidia(10DE 1065) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 10.4
10% 12.8 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 13.5
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 304 207 133 20 187 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 494
Write 473
Mixed 381
SusWrite 197
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 34.6
122% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 195
186% 292 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
32GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 144 179 170 143 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 159
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 150
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 113%
HP External HDD 1TB
121GB free, PID 4607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 38 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.2% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 36.9
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 37.1
48% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10AU0065JP Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AU0065JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback