Biostar TA790GX 128M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar TA790GX 128M  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '21 at 08:27
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9550
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 32
2-Core 65.2
39% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 133
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 108
Write 110
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 105
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 69%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-26A23T0 320GB
31GB free, PID 8017
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 19.2
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 24.5
27% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
333, 333, 333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.7
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TA790GX 128M Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA790GX 128M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback