Lenovo 20384

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 32% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20384  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo B50-70
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140609
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 29 '21 at 12:39
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU 68%
CPU Throttled 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 15.9
2-Core 27
29% 36.6 Pts
4-Core 45.4
8-Core 47.1
6% 46.2 Pts
64-Core 48.2
3% 48.2 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3815) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.3
0% 1.27 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Whalekom 256GB 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 188 171 258 330 352 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 363
Write 300
Mixed 234
SusWrite 249
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 3.4
34% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 71.4
DQ Write 84.9
DQ Mixed 19.8
31% 58.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 208%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
23.6% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 9.7
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 6.5
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20384 Builds (Compare 291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20384

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback