Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '21 at 08:00
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User UZB-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 168
2-Core 324
103% 192 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 629
73% 569 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 27.8
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 30.8
23% 29.2 fps
Splatting 22.8
23% 22.8 fps
Poor: 8% Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Shiji 512GB 512GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0729A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 255 215 199 253 261 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 471
Write 383
Mixed 387
SusWrite 265
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 22.4
127% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 31.4
85% 178 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 95%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
40GB free
Firmware: 0304
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 60
Write 87.4
Mixed 81.8
58% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Vasekey VSKD42ANB26MHZ8G VSKD41ANB26MHZ8G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 24.7
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 19.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5AB8 LG IPS FULLHD
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,752 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback