Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K/BR  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201026
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 21:36
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 65.5
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 206
65% 119 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 438
61% 452 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.14
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 21.8
13% 17.5 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 17
Splatting 14.1
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 37 111 44 158 333 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 301
Write 3
Mixed 101
SusWrite 121
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 13
90% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 3.3
18% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 81%
WD100EZEX-08WN4A0 1TB
324GB free
Firmware: 01.01R.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 91 98 98 99 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 95.1
Write 97.5
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 96.7
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3000 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.2% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 23.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K/BR Builds (Compare 940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback