Gigabyte GA-B560M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 05:55
Run Duration585 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 81.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 258
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 757
75% 613 Pts
64-Core 758
47% 758 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 212
Parallax 217
179% 216 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 156
Splatting 138
132% 164 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 150%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-AG41TB 1TB
525GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 973 834 779 790 866 902 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,646
Write 2,459
Mixed 1,775
SusWrite 857
380% 1,684 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 59.3
196% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 785
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 524
401% 555 MB/s
Poor: 191%
This bench: 205%
Great: 473%
Adata SX 8200PNP 2TB
81GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 228 240 240 243 228 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Write 235
Mixed 1
SusWrite 236
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 29.9
90% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 136
101% 132 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 91%
Realtek RTL9210 NVME 2TB
81GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 267 239 361 248 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 193
Write 314
Mixed 225
SusWrite 277
57% 252 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 24.5
73% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 159
113% 144 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 118%
SSK 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 199 218 220 226 204 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.1% Below average
Read 184
Write 183
Mixed 173
SusWrite 213
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 12.4
43% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 86
DQ Write 74.8
DQ Mixed 85.8
63% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 95%
External USB3.0 DISK00 16TB
3GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 91.7
Write 91.2
Mixed 58.2
100% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 67%
External USB3.0 DISK01 16TB
3GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 160
Write 171
Mixed 49.4
153% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
93% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK02 16TB
3GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 126
Write 151
Mixed 89.2
156% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
110% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 83%
External USB3.0 DISK04 16TB
8TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 44 50 52 51 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.8% Very poor
Read 46.5
Write 51.5
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 49.5
71% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
35% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 22%
External USB3.0 DISK03 16TB
3GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 87.6
Write 116
Mixed 64.4
116% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 48%
External USB3.0 14TB
66GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 26 33 35 34 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.4% Below average
Read 166
Write 156
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 31.5
124% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
External USB3.0 DISK01 14TB
66GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 27 32 33 30 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 76.1
Write 178
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 30.5
109% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 111%
External USB3.0 DISK02 14TB
66GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 34 35 34 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.2% Below average
Read 184
Write 164
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 32.8
131% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 129%
External USB3.0 DISK03 14TB
66GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 22 32 35 34 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.1% Below average
Read 157
Write 164
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 31.4
128% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 90%
External USB3.0 DISK04 14TB
66GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 32 33 34 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 168
Write 165
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 32.3
131% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 77%
External USB3.0 DISK00 16TB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 197
Write 234
Mixed 150
250% 194 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 1.4
444% 8.57 MB/s
DQ Read 3.1
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 1.3
488% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 141%
External USB3.0 DISK01 16TB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 46.6
119% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 1.4
306% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 93%
External USB3.0 DISK02 16TB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 114
Write 91
Mixed 129
143% 111 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 1.2
348% 7.57 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 112%
External USB3.0 DISK03 16TB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 111
Write 114
Mixed 68.1
122% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 1
387% 7.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1.9
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 1.4
422% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 131%
External USB3.0 DISK04 16TB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89.1
Write 90.9
Mixed 99.8
122% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 1
319% 7.93 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 122%
External USB3.0 DISK00 16TB
3GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 137
Write 172
Mixed 101
177% 137 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1
295% 7.17 MB/s
External USB3.0 DISK01 16TB
3GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 81.6
Write 111
Mixed 117
140% 103 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.1
244% 6.1 MB/s
External USB3.0 DISK02 16TB
3GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 103
Write 121
Mixed 161
174% 129 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
246% 7.67 MB/s
External USB3.0 DISK03 16TB
3GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 206
Write 152
Mixed 142
203% 167 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.7
246% 5.8 MB/s
External USB3.0 DISK04 16TB
3GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 83.7
Write 103
Mixed 170
165% 119 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.9
252% 6.57 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD48GUA60-36A180C G Skill Intl F4-2400C15-8GVR Limited KD48GUA60-36A180C G Skill Intl F4-2400C15-8GVR 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.6% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 19.5
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B560M DS3H Builds (Compare 3,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560M DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $404
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback