Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '21 at 10:27
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 93
2-Core 177
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 551
56% 452 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.4% Very good
Lighting 91.6
Reflection 90.2
Parallax 84.5
75% 88.8 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 80.7
Splatting 73.4
71% 89.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 275 304 340 326 324 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 468
Write 345
Mixed 325
SusWrite 314
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 30.6
110% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 265
213% 300 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 130%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
444GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 909 513 490 492 490 491 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
406GB free
Firmware: 1001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 152 153 155 154 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 147
Write 144
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 153
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86%
Great: 113%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
627GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 159 143 162 162 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 156
Mixed 46
SusWrite 156
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
754GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 25 17 11 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X8G64CB8HB5N-DG 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 34
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback