Lenovo 3209C54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 3209C54  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory17.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 11:12
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 178
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 482
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 44.7
Reflection 47.1
Parallax 42.4
36% 44.7 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 36.9
31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 225 233 236 129 9.9 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.9% Above average
Read 194
Write 100
Mixed 114
SusWrite 175
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 29.2
98% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 156
129% 184 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 102%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
524GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 126 128 128 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 128
Write 117
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 126
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
116GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 67 65 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 96.3
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 64
58% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
82% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 67%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
14GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.2 4.5 4.4 5.5 4.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 9
Mixed 10
SusWrite 4.2
12% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 9%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 8GB
7GB free, PID 5572
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 3.6 3.6 4 3.8 3.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 7.7
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 4
13% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.6
153% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 86D3 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.6% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3209C54 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3209C54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback