Lenovo 10B4S1J900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10B4S1J900  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1550 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150423
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 07:30
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 184
63% 113 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 276
32% 246 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 16.5
14% 17.9 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 15.4
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 113 70 50 96 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 419
Write 328
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 90.8
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 11.9
56% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 0.3
62% 144 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
233GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 123 126 129 129 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 127
Write 126
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 127
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10B4S1J900 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10B4S1J900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback