Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2PT  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 06:09
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 60
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 169
60% 108 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 362
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.1
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
PNY(196E 013B) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 8.4
6% 7 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 480GB 480GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 217 8.6 99 3.5 2.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 451
Write 408
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 84.7
53% 242 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 1.2
28% 8.67 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 0.3
26% 69 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030MN68F9F1600 Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 7.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2PT Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback