Asus M51AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus M51AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M51AC
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '21 at 19:25
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 204
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 455
51% 401 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 140
Parallax 131
104% 133 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 134
Splatting 117
100% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 428 464 450 454 372 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 476
Mixed 369
SusWrite 402
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 44
160% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 344
262% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 132 139 140 139 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 174
Write 165
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 135
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 128 132 135 137 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 131
Write 120
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 130
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 0420 MI64C1D1629Z1 0420 MI64C1D1629Z1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $208
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback