Asus M51AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus M51AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M51AC
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130625
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 23:29
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 206
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 510
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 140
Parallax 129
104% 132 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 133
Splatting 116
99% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 376 430 436 448 441 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 470
Mixed 365
SusWrite 402
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 45.8
163% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 346
264% 357 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 184 183 185 185 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 151
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 183
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 151 153 155 154 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 142
Write 141
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 152
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 105%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW-CF/MD 64GB
48GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 132 138 140 141 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 130
Write 141
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 132
151% 113 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.9
206% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 0420 MI64C1D1629Z1 0420 MI64C1D1629Z1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.3
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.5
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $212
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback