Asus M51AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus M51AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M51AC
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '21 at 19:19
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 546
55% 446 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 140
Parallax 129
103% 132 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 132
Splatting 117
99% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 358 388 373 377 372 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 435
Mixed 352
SusWrite 353
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 46.8
168% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 344
261% 351 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 139 140 139 140 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 161
Write 154
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 138
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 136 137 136 138 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 136
Write 131
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 135
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 0420 MI64C1D1629Z1 0420 MI64C1D1629Z1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.5% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $208
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback