TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Colorful BATTLE-AX B460M-HD PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemColorful BATTLE-AX B460M-HD PRO  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful BATTLE-AX B460M-HD PRO
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 13:43
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 83.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 220
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 697
69% 563 Pts
64-Core 935
58% 935 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 81.4%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Device(7377 1501) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.5% Good
Lighting 95.2
Reflection 92.3
Parallax 85.4
78% 91 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 81.1
Splatting 39.7
48% 60.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 67.5%
 Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 25 48 18 32 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 366
Write 201
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 29.6
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 1.7
35% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 8.2
DQ Write 15.3
DQ Mixed 14.8
10% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 26.6%
 Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
86GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 80 58 60 100 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 113
Write 117
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 81.8
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 56.1%
 Great: 109%
Toshiba HDWD220 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: KP000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 105 92 69 116 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 181
Write 169
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 103
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.5
254% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 82.2%
 Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK Kingston HX426C16FB/16 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.3% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 23.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 20.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 76.3%
 Great: 81%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical BATTLE-AX B460M-HD PRO Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: Colorful BATTLE-AX B460M-HD PRO

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel  $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples9x
Core i5-10400Intel  $126Bench 84%, 71,804 samples2x
Core i3-10100Intel  $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples2x
GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples8x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples1x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples1x
SSD
SL500 1TBColorfulBench 84%, 195 samples7x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples2x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples1x
RAM
CVPC08G2666D4R8 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 73 samples6x
HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK Kingston HX426C16FB/16 32GBHynixBench 79%, 2 samples2x
W641GU49J2320ND 2x8GBUnknownBench 68%, 31 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback