Foxconn P55A Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFoxconn P55A Series  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN P55A Series
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 13:27
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 152
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 300
28% 234 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.6% Above average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 72.6
Parallax 63.9
50% 66.1 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 57.1
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 39 44 42 44 44 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.6% Below average
Read 181
Write 152
Mixed 151
SusWrite 41.1
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 20.7
68% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 118
90% 122 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
621GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.3% Average
Read 181
Write 153
Mixed 163
SusWrite 44.6
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 25.2
81% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 131
98% 132 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 121 117 121 124 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 102
Write 116
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 118
71% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 75%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 46 45 46 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 117
Write 107
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 44.3
53% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
349% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 110%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
758GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 43 43 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 42.1
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P55A Series Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Foxconn P55A Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $184
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback