Lenovo 90H10016MW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 90H10016MW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3100
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 12:58
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 200
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 802
71% 602 Pts
64-Core 1,053
65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Device(1642 1727) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1149 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.45.40.14
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 29.9
17% 26 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 20
19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 314 318 317 321 323 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,442
Write 931
Mixed 690
SusWrite 344
189% 852 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 65.6
219% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 800
DQ Write 556
DQ Mixed 679
507% 678 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 177%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 188 189 189 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 124
Mixed 84
SusWrite 189
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90H10016MW Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90H10016MW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback