Notebook W65_W67RZ1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemNotebook W65_W67RZ1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_W67RZ1
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160817
Uptime16.3 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 21:46
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 174
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 326
45% 333 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 6509) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 6.1
5% 5.83 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 402 397 391 398 387 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 359
Write 377
Mixed 311
SusWrite 391
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 35.9
128% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 163
152% 231 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 102%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
29GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
8.37% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 16.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 16.6
20% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-8GRS 1315 CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBR2 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.5% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 21
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 19
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65_W67RZ1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_W67RZ1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 14% - Very poor Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback