Biostar H310MHP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H310MHP  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 13:45
Run Duration390 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 240
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 708
74% 594 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 1F06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.6% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 99.3
Parallax 109
88% 105 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 105
Splatting 97.1
94% 117 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 107GB
62GB free (System drive)
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,637
Write 6,392
Mixed 6,608
1,463% 6,546 MB/s
4K Read 414
4K Write 418
4K Mixed 405
1,368% 412 MB/s
DQ Read 1,141
DQ Write 1,141
DQ Mixed 1,121
848% 1,134 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 21%
CGM Virtual Disk 35606 12TB
3TB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 31 25 27 29 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
CGM Virtual Disk 40726 12TB
1.5TB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 24 22 22 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 13% Great: 16%
CGM Virtual Disk 41238 1TB
652GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 21 19 20 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 9% Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.9% Very good
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 23.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 22.7
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310MHP Builds (Compare 1,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $298
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback