Lenovo 3156AF8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 3156AF8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 12:12
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31220-$305
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 170
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 278
42% 306 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 4.4
4% 4.33 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$59
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 31 19 83 60 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 25.9
Write 16
Mixed 54
SusWrite 60.4
30% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
103% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
901GB free
Firmware: JC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 93 93 93 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 94.6
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 93.8
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston ACR256X64D3U13C9G 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3156AF8 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3156AF8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback