Gigabyte GA-MZAPLBP-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGIGABYTE GB-BPCE-3455
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MZAPLBP-00  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180813
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 10:41
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3455
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 40.3
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 81.8
32% 54.7 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 154
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1002
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 2.5
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 240GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 85 60 60 66 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 362
Write 324
Mixed 242
SusWrite 103
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 12
78% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 35.7
60% 117 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.9% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MZAPLBP-00 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MZAPLBP-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback