Gigabyte GA-MZAPLBP-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGIGABYTE GB-BPCE-3455
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MZAPLBP-00  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180813
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 09:32
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3455
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 38.2
1-Core 39.1
2-Core 79.3
31% 52.2 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 134
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 2.2
2% 1.77 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 240GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 96 91 56 57 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 339
Write 283
Mixed 291
SusWrite 89.4
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 15.4
64% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 47.4
68% 127 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 211
19% 211 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MZAPLBP-00 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MZAPLBP-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback