HP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83E1
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 06:36
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 445
59% 441 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.5% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 39.9
Parallax 37.1
29% 37.7 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 26.3
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 2.5" 120GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0324A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 55 37 32 31 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 450
Write 277
Mixed 52
SusWrite 47.3
45% 207 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 1
46% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 86.1
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 22.1
42% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
449GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 107 107 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 98.4
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 106
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x7508] JHD2400U1708JY 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
63.1% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 19.4
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 20.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF Builds (Compare 813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback