HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory90.9 GB free of 96.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 09:44
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 167
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 640
57% 482 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 237
Write 138
Mixed 136
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 22.8
89% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 59.1
73% 131 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 79%
Seagate ST3000NM0023 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: MS03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 177
Write 45.5
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 45
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST3000NXCLAR3000 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: GS14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 179
Write 44.5
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 44.9
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST3000NXCLAR3000 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: GS14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 173
Write 44
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 44.9
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 95%
HP DF300A4950 300GB
147GB free
Firmware: HPD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 55 56 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.2% Average
Read 112
Write 58.1
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 55.4
54% 73 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.3
227% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 51%
SanDisk SSD P4 32GB
27GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.8% Poor
Read 24.5
Write 23.7
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 24
29% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.5
234% 3.83 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 20.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback