Dell PowerEdge T610

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell PowerEdge T610
MotherboardDell PowerEdge T610  (all builds)
Memory44.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180522
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateApr 21 '21 at 15:22
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 62.1
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 125
51% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 491
51% 412 Pts
64-Core 1,175
73% 1,175 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-240 240GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 64 60 80 60 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 200
Write 294
Mixed 103
SusWrite 73.2
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 7
58% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 14.4
58% 128 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 94%
HP DF300A4950 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: HPD3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 60 60 60 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
Read 117
Write 57.3
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 59.7
56% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.2
210% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ81RF4BCFD-DJ-F 6x8GB
6 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.6% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge T610 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge T610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback