Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3067-A1
Memory	12.1 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '21 at 07:51
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31225 3,353 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 81.3 2-Core 162 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 321 43% 323 Pts	64-Core 317 20% 317 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B 0630) 2GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 4.6 3% 4.67 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 5 Splatting 4.6 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB 2,181 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN4763 SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 364 387 401 400 89 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 466 Write 409 Mixed 368 SusWrite 340 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 33 117% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 136 123% 181 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 931GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 189 183 188 191 184 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 140 Mixed 77.7 SusWrite 187 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 113%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.9 1.6 0.9 1.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 26.4 Write 0.5 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 1.1 6% 7.43 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Mixed 0 30% 2.65 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB RMR5040ED58E9W1600 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Nanya NT2GC72B89B0NF-CG 14GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.1% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	4x
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	2x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	2x

SSD
240GB SSD 240GBLexarBench 61%, 2,181 samples	2x
Raid 0 Volume 480GBIntelBench 105%, 11,256 samples	1x
M500 240GBCrucial $79Bench 77%, 31,779 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB RMR5040ED58E9W1600 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Nanya NT2GC72B89B0NF-CG 14GBHynixBench 50%, 3 samples	3x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 5,657 samples	2x
NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 39 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16